AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Mysql vs postgresql benchmark 20201/26/2024 I prefer Postgres, though I haven't had a chance to use it, as most of the time I'm not choosing the platform. partitioning, replication, covering indexes, in-memory operation are all really useful for high-volume. I believe you'll find some features of MySQL/Maria scaled with the use by high volume sites like news aggregators Slashdot, & Digg. MySQL/Maria supports running on systems with fewer resources (it's generally smaller), more/better/additional partitioning/sharding methods, more replication strategies (partially thanks to the for-profit wing of MySQL, covering indexes on InnoDB, in-memory operation. Large structured data is normalized to multiple SQL tables and suffers in terms of performance. I'm not an expert in the area, but I am a bit interested in what sort of errors you experienced trying to use MariaDB.Īs far as feature comparisons, I found a few sources. 2020 has placed MySQL as the most popular database for 2020. MariaDB is the literal, not just spiritual, successor to MySQL. These features give you performance, functionality, or development advantages, but further tie your software to the chosen platform.Īfter Oracle bought MySQL, people were understandably nervous about the future of the project. And with long-running projects, you start identifying and consuming the unique features of the tools you are using. Simple and fast and "helpful" is a really compelling argument, and part of why it underscores a lot of long-running projects. Adherents of strict type checking or people charged with running down data inconsistencies will strongly disagree that this is a "feature" at all, though. Automatically correcting common or simple errors was super convenient for small developers in the late 1990s, early 2000s. It also was more permissive about incorrect types and automatic type conversions (still is, I believe). Indexes speed up query performance but use. While robust enough for most use cases, MySQL doesn’t have the depth of capabilities of PostgreSQL, but the decision not to include these things is purposeful and with a view toward speed. MySQL was missing a lot of functionality, like transactions, but was really simple and blazing fast. In terms of performance, think of MySQL as a streamlined racehorse versus PostgreSQL as a powerful plow horse. Twenty years ago, Postgres was powerful but comparatively heavy.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |